Your Travel Guide From An OCD Guy
Comparison

Unleashing the Power: Intel Core i5 4670 vs Intel Core i9 10900X Benchmark Showdown

Hi there! I'm Zachary, the founder and lead writer of this travel blog. I'm on a mission to help fellow adventurers, explorers, and tourists make the most of their journeys around the world. A little about me - I'm a self-proclaimed travel addict with a slight case of OCD. From...

What To Know

  • If you’re looking for a powerful processor to handle demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or content creation, you might be torn between the Intel Core i5 4670 and the Intel Core i9 10900X.
  • The Intel Core i5 4670 is a quad-core processor with four threads, while the Intel Core i9 10900X boasts a whopping 10 cores and 20 threads.
  • The Intel Core i5 4670 has a TDP of 84 watts, while the Intel Core i9 10900X has a TDP of 165 watts.

Choosing the right CPU for your needs can be a daunting task, especially when considering the vast array of options available. If you’re looking for a powerful processor to handle demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or content creation, you might be torn between the Intel Core i5 4670 and the Intel Core i9 10900X. Both processors boast impressive performance capabilities, but they cater to different needs and budgets. This comprehensive comparison aims to shed light on the key differences between these two CPUs, helping you make an informed decision.

Architecture and Release Dates

The Intel Core i5 4670 and Intel Core i9 10900X belong to different generations and architectural families, making a direct comparison challenging. The i5 4670, released in 2013, is based on the Haswell architecture, while the i9 10900X, released in 2019, is part of the Cascade Lake-X family. The generational gap translates to significant differences in performance, features, and power consumption.

Core Count and Threading

One of the most prominent differences between the two processors lies in their core count and threading capabilities. The Intel Core i5 4670 is a quad-core processor with four threads, while the Intel Core i9 10900X boasts a whopping 10 cores and 20 threads. This substantial difference in core count and threading directly impacts the processors’ multi-tasking and parallel processing abilities. The i9 10900X excels in demanding applications that can leverage multiple cores and threads, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations.

Clock Speed and Turbo Boost

Clock speed is another crucial factor influencing CPU performance. The Intel Core i5 4670 has a base clock speed of 3.4 GHz and a Turbo Boost frequency of 3.6 GHz. On the other hand, the Intel Core i9 10900X boasts a base clock speed of 3.0 GHz and a Turbo Boost frequency of 4.7 GHz. While the i9 10900X has a lower base clock speed, its higher Turbo Boost frequency allows it to reach significantly higher clock speeds under demanding workloads, resulting in superior performance in single-threaded applications.

Cache Memory

Cache memory plays a vital role in optimizing CPU performance by storing frequently accessed data. The Intel Core i5 4670 has a 6 MB L3 cache, while the Intel Core i9 10900X offers a massive 19.25 MB L3 cache. The larger cache size of the i9 10900X allows it to store more data and access it faster, contributing to its overall performance advantage.

Integrated Graphics

Both the Intel Core i5 4670 and Intel Core i9 10900X feature integrated graphics solutions. The i5 4670 comes with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while the i9 10900X incorporates Intel UHD Graphics 630. While these integrated graphics units are suitable for basic tasks like web browsing and video playback, they are not designed for demanding gaming or graphics-intensive applications.

Power Consumption and Thermal Design Power (TDP)

The Intel Core i5 4670 has a TDP of 84 watts, while the Intel Core i9 10900X has a TDP of 165 watts. This significant difference in power consumption reflects the i9 10900X’s higher performance capabilities. The higher TDP of the i9 10900X requires a more robust cooling solution to prevent overheating and maintain stability.

Benchmark Performance

Benchmark tests provide a standardized way to compare the performance of different processors. In various benchmark tests, the Intel Core i9 10900X consistently outperforms the Intel Core i5 4670, especially in multi-threaded workloads. The i9 10900X delivers significantly higher scores in benchmarks like Cinebench R23, Geekbench 5, and 7-Zip, demonstrating its superior performance capabilities.

Gaming Performance

While the Intel Core i9 10900X excels in demanding applications, its gaming performance might not be as significant as its multi-core performance. In most games, the performance difference between the i5 4670 and the i9 10900X is minimal, especially at lower resolutions. The i9 10900X might offer a slight edge in games that can leverage multiple cores, but the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in most real-world scenarios.

Price and Value

The Intel Core i5 4670 is significantly cheaper than the Intel Core i9 10900X. The price difference reflects the vast performance gap between the two processors. While the i9 10900X offers superior performance, it comes at a premium price. The i5 4670 remains a viable option for users with a budget constraint and who primarily focus on single-threaded applications or light multi-tasking.

Final Thoughts: Choosing the Right CPU

The choice between the Intel Core i5 4670 and Intel Core i9 10900X ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you require a powerful processor for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific simulations, the Intel Core i9 10900X is the clear winner. Its high core count, threading capabilities, and superior performance make it an excellent choice for professionals and power users. However, if you’re on a budget and primarily focus on single-threaded applications or light multi-tasking, the Intel Core i5 4670 can still provide a satisfactory performance experience.

Frequently Discussed Topics

Q1: Which CPU is better for gaming?
A: While the i9 10900X offers superior performance in general, the performance difference in gaming between the i5 4670 and the i9 10900X is minimal, especially at lower resolutions. The i9 10900X might offer a slight edge in games that can leverage multiple cores, but the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in most real-world scenarios.
Q2: Is the i9 10900X worth the price?
A: The i9 10900X is a powerful processor, but its high price tag might not be justified for everyone. If you need a CPU for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or scientific simulations, the i9 10900X’s performance gains might be worth the investment. However, if you’re on a budget and your primary focus is on gaming or light multi-tasking, the i5 4670 might be a more cost-effective option.
Q3: What is the difference between the i5 4670 and the i9 10900X in terms of power consumption?
A: The i9 10900X has a significantly higher TDP (165 watts) compared to the i5 4670 (84 watts), reflecting its higher performance capabilities. This means the i9 10900X consumes more power and requires a more robust cooling solution to prevent overheating and maintain stability.
Q4: Can the i5 4670 still be used for gaming in 2023?
A: While the i5 4670 is an older processor, it can still provide a decent gaming experience at lower resolutions and settings. However, modern games are becoming more demanding, and the i5 4670 might struggle to deliver smooth gameplay at higher resolutions and settings. If you’re looking for the best gaming experience, a newer and more powerful processor is recommended.
Q5: Is the i9 10900X still relevant in 2023?
A: The i9 10900X is a powerful processor that remains relevant for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations. However, newer CPUs, like the 12th and 13th generation Intel CPUs, offer better performance per watt and are generally more energy-efficient. If you’re looking for the most cutting-edge performance, a newer CPU might be a better choice. However, the i9 10900X can still provide excellent performance for various workloads, especially if you can find it at a discounted price.

Was this page helpful?

Zachary Cooper

Hi there! I'm Zachary, the founder and lead writer of this travel blog. I'm on a mission to help fellow adventurers, explorers, and tourists make the most of their journeys around the world. A little about me - I'm a self-proclaimed travel addict with a slight case of OCD. From triple checking my bags before a flight to color-coding my itineraries, I like to stay organized and on top of every little detail when I travel. But don't worry, my attention to detail just means you can rely on my advice to be thorough and accurate!
Back to top button